Posters - Schedules

Posters Home

View Posters By Category

Thursday, November 3, 2022 between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM
Friday, November 4, 2022 between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM
Session A Poster Set-up and Dismantle
Session A Posters set up:
Thursday, November 3, 2022 between 8:00 AM and 10:30 AM
Session A Posters dismantle:
Friday, November 4, 2022 after 6:00 PM
Session B Poster Set-up and Dismantle
Session B Posters set up:
Thursday, November 3, 2022 between 8:00 AM and 10:30 AM
Session B Posters dismantle:
Friday, November 4, 2022 after 6:00 PM
Virtual Platform Only
33: Auditing structural bias in computational antimicrobial peptide design
COSI: la
  • Victor Daniel Aldas Bulos, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), Unidad Irapuato, Mexico
  • Fabien Plisson, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), Unidad Irapuato, Mexico


Presentation Overview: Show

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), small polypeptide chains part of the innate immune response of multiple organisms, have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional antibiotics given their low propensity to generate bacterial resistance. Multiple artificial intelligence algorithms have been developed for the rapid discovery and design of powerful AMPs at low cost. However, these algorithms can be riddled with biases inherent in the databases used for their training. AI applications in the biological sciences often undermine such problems besides biological datasets being highly susceptible to bias for different reasons such as evolutionary redundancies or experimental conditions. Machine learning algorithms intertwine predictive and generative models to design optimized AMP sequences rationally. Despite a vast structural diversity, most considered AMP candidates fold into alpha-helical structures Simple observations or voluntary model bias, the limitations within these models lie in the diversity of peptide sequences and biological information. Here, we analyzed the structural landscape of GRAMPA, one of the largest repositories of AMPs sequences and related biological activities. We evaluated the performance of 13 state-of-the-art AMP predictive models against different structural classes looking for possible bias where we identified that structural class imbalance led to misclassified predictions.

33: Auditing structural bias in computational antimicrobial peptide design
COSI: la
  • Victor Daniel Aldas Bulos, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), Unidad Irapuato, Mexico
  • Fabien Plisson, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), Unidad Irapuato, Mexico


Presentation Overview: Show

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), small polypeptide chains part of the innate immune response of multiple organisms, have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional antibiotics given their low propensity to generate bacterial resistance. Multiple artificial intelligence algorithms have been developed for the rapid discovery and design of powerful AMPs at low cost. However, these algorithms can be riddled with biases inherent in the databases used for their training. AI applications in the biological sciences often undermine such problems besides biological datasets being highly susceptible to bias for different reasons such as evolutionary redundancies or experimental conditions. Machine learning algorithms intertwine predictive and generative models to design optimized AMP sequences rationally. Despite a vast structural diversity, most considered AMP candidates fold into alpha-helical structures Simple observations or voluntary model bias, the limitations within these models lie in the diversity of peptide sequences and biological information. Here, we analyzed the structural landscape of GRAMPA, one of the largest repositories of AMPs sequences and related biological activities. We evaluated the performance of 13 state-of-the-art AMP predictive models against different structural classes looking for possible bias where we identified that structural class imbalance led to misclassified predictions.